while True: learn()
TL;DR
It is a puzzle/simulation game where you learn about machine learning and AI through the lens of your cat's coding skills. Players drag and connect objects to build a cat-to-human speech recognition system while navigating the freelance life of a data scientist. Expect to optimize, fail, and try again—just like real coding.
Genres:
Tags:
Likely Inspirations:
Steam Review Analysis – Total (updated Jul 26, 2025, 5:58 AM)
91%
Very Positive
6319
590
89%
Purchased on Steam
755
68
11%
Purchased Elsewhere
0% Primarily Play on Deck
Playtime Overview
Estimated Playthrough Time
7.92 hrs
Min Playtime
0.08 hrs
15th Percentile
2.97 hrs
Median Playtime
7.45 hrs
85th Percentile
17.75 hrs
Max Playtime
5613.23 hrs
Conclusion
Overall, the game is praised for its educational value and fun gameplay, with many players enjoying the challenge of its puzzles and the cute story involving a cat. However, some criticisms arise regarding its depth, reliance on visual scripting, and repetitive elements, with several players expressing disappointment in its educational promises not being fully realized. The addition of new reviews reinforces the game's strengths in teaching programming concepts while highlighting ongoing concerns about gameplay depth and repetitiveness.
Strongly Positive
Educational Value
The game effectively teaches programming concepts and machine learning in an engaging manner.
Fun Gameplay
Players find the game enjoyable and entertaining, making it a pleasant experience.
Positive
Challenging Puzzles
The puzzles provide a good level of challenge, requiring players to think critically.
Cute Story
The game's narrative involving a programmer and his cat adds charm and engagement.
Good Presentation
The game is well-presented, with clear explanations and a visually appealing design.
Learning Curve
Players appreciate the gradual introduction of programming concepts, making it accessible.
Neutral / Mixed Opinions
Negative
Visual Scripting
The game employs a visual scripting approach, which some players find less engaging than traditional coding.
Lack of Depth
Some players feel the game lacks complexity and depth in its programming mechanics.
Repetitive Gameplay
Players mention that the gameplay can become repetitive, especially in achieving gold medals.
RNG Dependence
The game is criticized for being overly reliant on random number generation, affecting gameplay consistency.
Strongly Negative
Share this analysis and support this page:
| Game | Impact | Score | Reviews | Type | Age |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Game | 6Y | ||||
DLC | 6Y | ||||
DLC | 6Y |
Updated on Aug 2, 2025, 4:36 PM